Town of Hague Planning Board
November 2, 2006
Members present: Chairman David Swanson, Rolly Allen, Tim Costello, Pam Peterson
Members absent: John Brown, Peter Foster
Also attending: ZEO Cathy Clark, Recording Secretary Nancy Young
Public Hearing
The Public Hearing was called to order by David Swanson at 7:24 pm.
Shaw, (12-1-7 and 12-1-1.2) Trout Brook Rd. OCI
The Notice of Public Hearing as it appeared in the Post Star on 10/23/2006 was read by Cathy Clark.
The applicants are requesting sketch plan approval of a subdivision/lot line change. They own two lots; lot #1 is 2.33 acres and lot #2 is 8.71 acres. The father and son would like to transfer approximately 3 acres from lot #2 to lot #1, making both lots size conforming. Lot #1 would measure 5.33 acres and lot #2 would measure 5.71 acres. At present, lot #1 is land locked. If approved, the subdivision would provide it with access to Trout Brook Rd.
No one in attendance spoke for or against the proposal.
David Swanson closed the Public hearing at 7:25 pm.
Regular Meeting
The regular monthly meeting of the Planning Board was called to order at 7:25 pm. by David Swanson.
After introductions, the minutes from the 10/5/2006 meeting were approved as written on a motion made by Rolly Allen and seconded by Tim Costello.
Vote: Carried, 4-0
Shaw, (12-1-7 and 12-1-1.2) Trout Brook Rd. OCI
Tim Costello moved to grant conceptual approval of the Sketch Plan based on:
- confirmation of deeded access or ROW over State land for both lots
- the 3 acres divided off will be added to the smaller, 2.33 acre lot
- the lots cannot be further subdivided.
Rolly Allen seconded the motion.
Vote: Carried, 4-0
Waters, (25.4-1-18.11) 239 Decker Hill Rd. OCI and SCUZ
Mr. Waters is requesting Sketch Plan approval for a four lot subdivision of a 16.1 acre parcel. The property is located in the Special Commercial Use Zone. If approved, each parcel will consist of 4 acres.
Planning Board issues:
150-4 Review of Sketch Plan
150-6 Minor subdivision
Discussion was heard concerning the number of previous, minor subdivisions requested by the applicant. It was noted that the APA takes into consideration the cumulative impact of multiple subdivisions. By their standards, once the 15th lot is divided from a property, a full SEQR review is required. Cathy Clark stated she was unable to determine the number of lots divided from the original parcel since 1972. Mr. Waters has not yet filed a Jurisdictional Inquiry Form with the APA. Concerned about the density in the area, the Board decided to table the matter until the JIF is filed and reviewed.
Pucek Family Trust and Rezac (93.19-1-22 & 93.19-1-19) Spring Hill Lane TR1
The applicants are requesting a lot line change of 649 sq. feet. At present, the Rezac property measures 1.1 acres; the Pucek lot is 1.94 acres. If approved, the Rezac property will increase to 1.925 acres.
Planning Board issue: 150-27 lot line change
Dr. Ed Becker spoke on behalf of the property owners and explained the need to correct a 20 year old surveying error. He assured Planning Board members that the change will not affect any setbacks and will not make anything non-conforming. A recent survey of the area was provided.
After a brief discussion and review of the map, the following motion was heard from Rolly Allen: To approve the lot line change with the assumption that the data is as represented in the survey, and that the conditions are approved by the parties, and that the Planning Board elects to waive the Public Hearing.
Pam Peterson seconded the motion.
Vote: Carried, 4-0
Referral to the ZBA:
Macionis, (26.6-1-1) 9500 Lakeshore Dr. TR1
The applicant is requesting an addition of a 3 ft. by 24 ft. walkway to an existing home. The current shoreline setback of the structure is 51 ft. The walkway, if approved, will be 48 ft. from the lake.
Variance issue: 160-50, shoreline setbacks
Cathy Clark noted that the ZBA denied Mr. Macionis’ original request for a 6 ft. walkway. He has reapplied with a modified proposal. In general, all agreed this is a more reasonable request, with minimal impact.
Pam Peterson moved to recommend to the ZBA that they approve the 3 ft. by 24 ft. walkway.
Rolly Allen seconded the motion.
Vote: Carried 4-0
Strycker, (43.17-1-3) 35 Springdale Manor Dr. TR1
The Stryckers would like to replace their pre-existing, non-conforming one-story home with a two story house. The home is located 28 ft from the shoreline. Septic is in compliance for the proposed 3 bedroom residence. The footprint of the structure will not change.
Planning Board issues:
160-23 C(g) Construction within 100 ft of the lake
160-62 A, Non-conforming structures
Cathy Clark reported that the ZBA has approved a variance for a greater than 25% increase of square footage and for construction within 50 ft. of the lake.
Letters from LG Waterkeeper, Chris Navitsky, dated 11/2/2006 and Kathleen Bozony of the LGA, dated 11/1/2006 were noted. Both contained suggestions for storm water and erosion control measures.
When reviewing the drawings of the proposed residence, the proximity to the shoreline and the increase in height prompted concern about the visual impact from the lake. In the course of discussion, suggestions were offered which would mitigate the effect, such as a roof line modification and landscape design. Mr. and Mrs. Strycker were present, and at their request the Board agreed to table the matter until this concern can be addressed.
Hume, (26.6-1-9) Forest Bay Rd N., TR1R
The applicants own a legal, pre-existing, non-conforming house. They are requesting
a 17.4% bedroom addition and a 401 sq. ft. addition to an existing deck. The present setback would reduce from 44 ft. to 39 ft. In 2002, a new 500 gal. septic tank was installed. The property is located in the proposed Town Sewer District #2.
Referral to the ZBA: 160-50 Shoreline setback
Planning Board issue: 160-24C(1)(b) new construction within 100 ft. of the lake
Available Planning Board members will join ZBA members for a Site Visit on 11/2/2006 at 9:00 am.
Other business
Dr. Becker, a former Vice Chairman of the Guilderland ZBA offered to provide Planning Board members with information/materials useful for SEQR review.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 pm on a motion made by Rolly Allen and seconded by Tim Costello.
Vote: carried, 4-0